One of them, a more overtly political script by William Gibson, was even published as a novelization.ĭivorced from the experiences of the production and the sky-high expectations of its fans, however, the film still has much to offer. Fans have pored over these ideas, imagining all the ways they would have been better than the flawed finished film. Another took place on a planet made entirely of wood and inhabited by monks who believe the alien is the second coming of the antichrist. One featured a ground war on Earth between xenomorphs and humans. It didn’t help that when word leaked out about earlier versions of the script that were scrapped, and some of them sound pretty darn good. Since he made Alien 3, Fincher had become one of his generation’s most revered film-makers, and few of his acolytes were prepared to disagree with the master’s assessment of his own work. It was successful enough to spawn another sequel, 1997’s Alien: Resurrection, not to mention four more Alien films (if you count the dreadful Alien vs Predator films) and counting.īut its reputation suffered its fatal wound in 2009 when Fincher himself essentially disowned the film, saying: “A lot of people hated Alien 3, but no one hated it more than I did.” It’s unclear if he was referring to the experience of making the film or the finished product (if he could even separate the two), but the totality of his denunciation made an impact. Roger Ebert called it “the best-looking bad movie I’ve ever seen”, which is representative of its perception at the time: flawed but certainly not without merit. It wasn’t beloved by critics, but it was hardly reviled. The film made $159m worldwide, just a shade under the $183m gross of its predecessor. Following reports of this on-set unrest, the public and press were prepared for a disaster, but instead its reception was one of mild disappointment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |